The Road Freight Association (RFA) has commented on the structure and nature of AARTO (the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences) since the first iteration of the Act in 1998. The intentions are noble – but the scope is too vast and the structure and processes far too intricate. From the beginning the Association has said – make it simpler (like everywhere else in the world), make it focussed (like everywhere else in the world) and make it accessible (ditto).
Obviously, the RFA – which is serious about improved road safety conditions, better efficient logistics and a reduction in the huge financial strain on the medical infrastructure of the country – supports any and all attempts to improve the state of safety on our roads by reducing the risks and aberrant behaviour that currently exist.
The RFA reiterates that the major contributors to incidents on the roads must be identified and clearly prioritised – so that the causes for these incidents (crashes) that result in injuries and death can be addressed through a concerted effort to change behaviour.
Behaviour that results in these factors playing the contributing role that they do.
The RFA highlights that, through-out the world – successfully targeted actions focussing on demotivational programmes to modify aberrant behaviour are the norm, and have been successful.
However, there are some serious flaws in AARTO – which will negatively affect the efficacy of the intended system as well as create huge operational challenges regarding vehicles – which will result in negative effects to the financial and operational sustainability of road freight businesses in South Africa.
Appeals Tribunal – administrative burden
The AARTO Act refers to the appointment of a Tribunal – one Tribunal – not one per Province, licensing authority or Metropolitan area.
According to reports, there were 1 823 040 infringements issued during the 2024 calendar year (in Tshwane & Johannesburg alone). If 10% of these infringements are to be appealed, it will amount to roughly 180 000 appeal cases being heard by the appeal Tribunal consisting of 09 people hearing each appeal.
A simple calculation suggests that they will have to hear approximately 850 appeals per day. This will create a bottleneck in the system.
What about ALL the infringements issued across the whole country (when in operation)? How will the Tribunal cope?
The appeals process will require documents to be handed in, stamped, signed and a copy be handed back to the infringer, all by the local licensing department / issuing authority which are already overloaded with their current workload in terms of licensing and testing of vehicles and drivers.
These additional AARTO responsibilities will create longer queues and more pressure at these centres.
The question to be asked is whether these centres will be able to cope with this additional burden and whether all the local authorities and municipalities are aware of the additional duties that AARTO will require and whether they have budgeted sufficiently for these services.
Furthermore: Tribunal members are appointed on a part-time basis. How will they deal with the possible workload, given the example of possible volumes of work heading the way of the Tribunal?.
Finally: legislation requires the Tribunal to be appointed when the legislation is enacted. Where is the Tribunal?
Demerit points for vehicles
The RFA has always opposed the issuing of demerit points to vehicles.
Nowhere else in the world do vehicles get demerit points to “change behaviour” – a vehicle is either roadworthy and fit to be used on a public road, or not. The objective is to reduce risk and ensure that vehicles being operated on the road are roadworthy – if not then remove from the road, repair, inspect and reissue roadworthy.
Currently a vehicle is suspended from operation on a public road – and once repaired and having “passed” a roadworthy test, is again able to operate (and generate income).
Thus the current legislation. when properly and consistently applied by road traffic authorities. will achieve the desired aim far better than vehicles earning points and being barred from being returned to use when repaired.
Furthermore, as regards the resale / trade / cycling of vehicles: the effect of points allocated to vehicles will result in stalling / refusal of sales (or vastly reduced valuation of vehicles / delay in fleet replacement / ability to trade vehicles). This will impact both private vehicle transactions (from luggage trailers and caravans / private vehicles to fleet / commercial vehicles).
Vehicle cycle and demand operations of businesses (whether rental / fleet leasing or operational) is huge and cannot be taken lightly. It is important to highlight that in the case of representations, the process to follow is convoluted in being time consuming, hugely administrative and reliant on authorities providing information / confirmation and feedback within the prescribed time frames.
The cost element for any company is that if the representation is rejected (on whatever basis) no discount will apply and the full penalty and applicable fees will be payable. Penalty levies are a revenue generation process – nothing more, nothing less.
Exceeding the total number of demerit points for a particular vehicle results in the suspension / cancellation of the operator card for that vehicle. Further to this – Section 46(1) of the NRTA (the National Road Traffic Act 93 of 1996) notes that a new operator card cannot be issued to an operator where any vehicle operator card has been suspended (for the period of that suspension).
The Association cannot say it loudly enough, or repeat it enough times – Scrap points on vehicles!
Rehabilitation Programme
Habitual offenders are eligible for a rehabilitation programme (after the second suspension as per definition of a “Habitual Offender”).
Whilst the RFA supports all initiatives to improve road safety and the general behaviour of all road users, it is not convinced that AARTO will change the current behaviour of road users.
Finally, the impact a demerit point system will have on drivers in a country where there is no alternative public transport network to speak of, is concerning. In all other countries across the globe where a demerit point system is in place – and is successful in having a positive impact on driver behaviour – a reliable, efficient and developed public transport service is in place.
Having thousands of infringements / offences that are to be policed and administratively dealt with is too far a stretch.
Most other countries have between 15 and 30 BEHAVIOURAL causes that are focussed on. Results there speak for themselves. They are far simpler systems, with manageable processes and measurable results. More importantly – with positive change in the identified areas.
It’s time to radically rethink the way in which AARTO needs to be focussed and applied.
By Gavin Kelly, CEO of the Road Freight Association
The South African Freight and Logistics Association (SAFLA) and the Association of Meat Importers and Exporters of South Africa (AMIE SA) have signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to deepen collaboration on the logistics, port-operational and regulatory issues affecting South Africa’s meat trade.
SAFLA and AMIE SA will use the MoC to identify recurring constraints, exchange evidence and develop practical, solutions-focused proposals for engagement with government agencies and stakeholders. The partnership will support constructive dialogue on port operations, border processes, veterinary and sanitary requirements, market access, rail and road connectivity, and supply-chain resilience.
A United Voice to Find Practical Solutions
“Logistics is fundamental to food security, trade competitiveness and economic growth,” says Jonathan McDonald, Vice Chairman of SAFLA. “This MoC gives SAFLA and AMIE SA a stronger platform to speak with one informed voice, engage constructively with government agencies and work with them to resolve issues that affect cargo flow, costs and reliability. We are most effective when industry brings evidence, expertise and practical solutions to the table.”
Paul Matthew, CEO of AMIE SA, adds that improved collaboration between industry and government is essential if South Africa is to turn trade opportunities into measurable growth. “We have the product, the capability and markets that are ready to buy South African meat,” Matthew notes. “What is required is effective coordination: clear communication between national and provincial authorities, efficient certification and inspection processes, and a willingness to bring the private sector into the solution.”
For meat exporters, the ability to supply international customers consistently is crucial. Delays in market-access processes and veterinary approvals can cause buyers to source from alternative suppliers. Animal-health events remain a trade risk, underlining the importance of robust traceability, credible controls and internationally accepted approaches to regionalisation.
Matthew highlights that trade is not a zero-sum choice between exports and domestic affordability. “Export markets enable producers to obtain value for different cuts across the carcass. That improves overall carcass balance and can support a more sustainable, affordable domestic supply,” he says.
The MoC recognises that food safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable. Its purpose is to support processes that are rigorous, proportionate and consistently applied, while ensuring that avoidable administrative bottlenecks do not undermine trade, jobs or consumer access to protein.
AMIE SA estimates that South Africa exported approximately 81,000 tonnes of red meat, including beef, sheep and goat meat, worth around R63 billion between 2025 and May 2026, demonstrating the significant economic potential of the sector even amid disease-related and administrative constraints.
The freight-forwarding sector that enables this trade is itself substantial, with South Africa’s freight-forwarding market estimated to have generated approximately R81 billion in revenue in 2025. Freight forwarders also coordinate more than 80% of the country’s international trade, reinforcing the strategic importance of efficient, reliable logistics systems.
Room for Further Improvement
“Meat trade depends on logistics, predictable inspection and cargo-release processes, veterinary controls, and reliable access to international markets,” continues McDonald. “When these systems do not operate in concert, the consequences are felt by producers, importers, exporters, cold stores, transporters, processors, retailers and consumers.”
While there have been encouraging improvements in infrastructure and equipment in the Durban port, industry continues to confront operational pressure points, including cold-chain capacity, container handling, inspection coordination and release of consignments.
“Through industry engagement, communication and joint advocacy, SAFLA and AMIE SA intend to help convert recurring challenges into coordinated action,” concludes McDonald. “The associations believe that a unified industry voice, combined with respectful partnership with government, can improve the country’s logistics ecosystem, strengthen national supply-chain performance and support a competitive, resilient South African meat sector.”
Jonathan McDonald – Vice Chair of SAFLA, with Paul Matthew, CEO of AMIE SA
Jonathan McDonald – Vice Chair of SAFLA, with Paul Matthew, CEO of AMIE SA
On 14 July 2026, representatives of the South African Freight and Logistics Association (SAFLA) met in person with SARS Customs management teams in the Western Cape and Johannesburg to advance practical solutions for the freight forwarding and logistics sector.
The engagements build on SAFLA’s formal representation in SARS Customs stakeholder structures and are intended to create direct, practical channels between Customs and industry at regional level. The focus is on efficient trade processes, timely and transparent communication, responsible representation and consistent compliance.
“This is what practical partnership looks like,” says SAFLA Executive Officer Dave Logan. “We are not waiting for problems to accumulate. We are engaging SARS regionally, with clear agendas and evidence from members, so that issues can be addressed before they add avoidable time and cost to legitimate trade.”
Dave Logan, SAFLA Executive Officer
Western Cape Establishes a Structured Working Relationship
SAFLA’s Western Cape Working Group met the SARS Customs regional management team to present the Association’s national and regional model and agree on a structured engagement process.
SARS welcomed the platform and committed to monthly management meetings with the Working Group. It also indicated that broader stakeholder meetings involving customs brokers, shipping lines, depots and freight forwarders would be reinstated.
“SAFLA will continue to participate in quarterly Sea Modality structures and circulate meeting agendas in advance so that both sides arrive prepared to resolve clearly defined issues,” says SAFLA Vice President Jonathan McDonald. “The first formal management meeting is scheduled for 4 August 2026, with a broader stakeholder meeting expected later that month.”
Jonathan McDonald, SAFLA Vice President
“SARS is reviewing Western Cape Customs processes, operating practices and potential technology improvements. SAFLA members will be able to contribute evidence-based input on bottlenecks, inspection delays, communication gaps and the commercial cost of avoidable hold-ups,” McDonald adds.
This channel is particularly important for smaller operators, which have less capacity to absorb the cost of delays and repeated administrative escalation.
Regional Engagement Progresses in Johannesburg and KwaZulu-Natal
In Johannesburg, SAFLA representatives outlined the Association’s purpose and regional engagement model to SARS Customs. SARS indicated a willingness to meet monthly on Customs matters affecting Johannesburg, including Sea Modality issues.
As the relationship moves towards formalisation, SARS requested SAFLA’s stakeholder engagement documentation, confirmation of the Association’s recognition, an organisational chart and current membership numbers. These governance steps will support a durable, properly constituted relationship and inform engagement in other SARS regions.
SAFLA’s KwaZulu-Natal Working Group has meanwhile focused on engagement with Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) at the Port of Durban, as road congestion continues to affect access to terminals and depots.
“At a meeting on 24 July, the port manager outlined short- and long-term interventions being implemented. Road access remains a particular concern, including access to the port’s container terminals, the Island View (Cutler) Complex and Bulk Connections,” explains Dave Watts, a member of SAFLA’s KwaZulu-Natal Working Group.
SAFLA KZN Working Group Member Dave Watts
International Container Terminal Services (ICTSI) assumed day-to-day operational responsibility for Durban Container Terminal Pier 2 in January 2026 under its partnership with Transnet.
“Regular engagement with management across Durban’s container terminals is continuing. At Durban Gateway Terminal, members are reporting limited truck-booking slots and considerable staging-area delays. High volumes, vessel bunching and equipment breakdowns are among the issues understood to be affecting performance,” Watts adds.
The KwaZulu-Natal Working Group also attended a regional SARS Customs meeting as an observer and is working to establish an ongoing relationship with regional Customs officials.
A Practical, Outcomes-Based Relationship
“These engagements show that both parties are willing to build practical, accountable working relationships focused on measurable outcomes. SAFLA’s role is to bring evidence, represent members with integrity and work alongside SARS on solutions that improve both trade facilitation and compliance,” McDonald says.
“SAFLA exists to give freight forwarders a credible voice, nationally and in every region where trade happens. We will keep engaging constructively and measure success by whether the issues raised translate into clearer processes and operational improvements,” he concludes.
A shipment arriving in South Africa rarely reaches its destination using just one form of transport. A container might arrive by ship, travel inland by rail and complete the final leg of its journey by road before reaching a warehouse or distribution centre. It’s a process most businesses rely on without giving it much thought, but it has a name: intermodal transport.
As supply chains become more complex, moving goods efficiently is no longer about choosing one mode of transport over another. It’s about understanding how road, rail, sea and air can work together. For South Africa, where freight often travels hundreds of kilometres between ports, cities and distribution hubs, that approach is becoming increasingly important.
One Journey, Multiple Modes of Transport
Intermodal transport refers to moving goods using two or more modes of transport during a single journey, while the cargo remains in the same container or trailer. Instead of unpacking and repacking products at every stage, the container itself is transferred between ships, trains and trucks until it reaches its final destination.
The approach combines the strengths of each transport mode. Sea freight is well suited to international shipping, rail can move large volumes over long distances and road transport provides the flexibility needed to collect and deliver goods almost anywhere in the country.
Why it Matters in South Africa
South Africa’s freight network stretches across thousands of kilometres, connecting ports, industrial centres, warehouses and retail hubs. Imported goods arriving in Durban or Cape Town often need to reach businesses in Gauteng, while agricultural exports from inland provinces make the journey in the opposite direction before leaving the country.
No single mode of transport can efficiently handle every stage of those journeys. Intermodal transport allows logistics providers to use each network where it performs best, creating a more connected and efficient supply chain.
Building More Efficient Supply Chains
Moving freight across South Africa rarely goes exactly to plan. Delays at a port, road closures or disruptions on the rail network can quickly affect the rest of the journey, forcing logistics providers to rethink how goods reach their destination.
Using different modes of transport gives businesses more options when those challenges arise. Instead of relying on a single route, they can adapt their transport plans and keep freight moving with as little disruption as possible.
Connecting Transport Through Technology
Keeping freight moving across several transport networks depends on good communication. Warehouse teams, transport operators and customers all need to know where shipments are and when they’re expected to arrive.
Digital tracking, transport management systems and electronic documentation have made that much easier. With better visibility across the journey, businesses can respond more quickly to delays, keep customers informed and make day-to-day transport planning far more straightforward.
Looking Beyond a Single Mode of Transport
The most efficient supply chains don’t rely on just one way of moving goods. Road, rail, sea and air each solve different transport challenges, and together they create a stronger, more connected logistics network.
As South Africa’s transport infrastructure continues to evolve, businesses are looking beyond individual transport modes and focusing on how they work together. Choosing the right combination often makes a bigger difference than choosing the fastest route alone.