Early optimism for economic recovery in 2026 is giving way to renewed pressure, as rising energy costs, freight disruptions and geopolitical tensions weigh on global and South African markets. At the start of the year, expectations were anchored in potential ratings upgrades, interest rate cuts, and a stronger rand. The World Bank projected growth improving from an estimated 0.8% in 2024 to 1.8% in 2025, with further stabilisation (2%) in the medium term. However, escalating global risks, volatile commodity prices, and persistent cost-of-living pressures are challenging that outlook.
Manufacturers are already feeling this impact. They face mounting input cost pressures driven by higher oil prices, freight inflation and supply disruptions – forcing a sharper focus on inventory discipline, supplier diversification and exchange-rate risk management.
South Africa’s manufacturing sector showed modest resilience, with output rising 0.9% year-on-year in March but despite this, manufacturing output still declined by 1.0% quarter on quarter, signalling the recovery’s fragility.
“What manufacturers should consider is that margin protection now depends on how well they manage inventory, input costs, and supply continuity,” said Dr. Greg Cline, Head of Portfolio Management at Investec. “Some businesses are already responding by front-loaded stock to avoid losing customers when supply is disrupted. The blockage of key shipping routes including the Strait of Hormuz, responsible for about 20% of the world’s oil – has highlighted the scale of exposure. Others are reassessing their inventory costing models to absorb rising replacement costs more effectively. In this environment, preparation matters.”
According to Investec, manufacturing remains highly exposed to imported raw materials, transport costs and currency volatility. Oil prices have surged over $100 per barrel during recent conflict, adding pressure on the rand, ultimately impacting local firms that rely on imported inputs. The knock-on effects however extend across the manufacturing base.
A further concern for manufacturers and retailers is fertiliser disruption. Gulf producers account for a substantial share of globally traded urea and other fertiliser inputs, raising the prospect of higher agricultural costs and, ultimately, further food price pressure if shipping disruptions persist.
“There is usually a delay from when the initial shock is felt to when manufacturers fully feel the impact in factory pricing,” said Cline. “Businesses may still be working through stock bought before the latest escalation, but once that inventory runs down, higher replacement costs start to feed through quickly. That is why we are seeing front-loading of orders and a much sharper focus on stock planning.”
At the same time, from a logistics standpoint, concerns are mounting as manufacturers are contending with rising sea and air freight costs, shifting cargo capacity and higher fuel surcharges. For sectors reliant on time-sensitive imports, these logistics costs can quickly bleed margins and disrupt customer fulfilment.
In response, businesses are being urged to take proactive steps. This includes reviewing inventory policies, identifying alternative suppliers and taking advantage of periods of rand strength to lock in favourable exchange rates. Tailored treasury and working capital strategies are also becoming critical as firms navigate increasingly volatile conditions.
“This market is defined by risk and uncertainty, and businesses cannot remain stagnant. Instead, they must act,” said Cline. “Businesses that survive, protect their margins effectively by staying close to their cost base, keeping stock available for customers, and moving early when market conditions improve. In a period of uncertainty, disciplined planning is most certainly a competitive advantage.”
Fuel prices are set to increase sharply on Wednesday night at 24h00 – basically due to higher international prices.
In addition, there will be a further 4.9c a litre increase due to the wage increase for forecourt employees as well as a 21,9c a litre for the slate levy. This will see 93 ULP/LRP: at R26.76 per litre and 95 ULP/LRP at R26.92 per litre.
Diesel will climb to R29.11 per litre 500ppm (wholesale) and R30.05 per litre 50ppm (wholesale). Every litre of fuel consumed on South Africa’s roads affects the underlying health of the country’s logistics economy. Changes in fuel prices have a far-reaching effect on the country’s supply chain, transport systems, the wider logistics industry as well as the pricing of goods on store shelves.
This increase in the price of fuel is yet another reminder of just how highly susceptible the industry is to the volatility of global oil markets. As fuel prices rise, transport companies, fleet operators, and freight customers must brace for the pressure on operational costs.
Depending on the type of operation, routes, vehicles and specific conditions of the transport leg, fuel can be anywhere between 35% and 55% of operating costs. Fuel is one of the three largest operating costs in the transport industry, thus even small price fluctuations can have significant consequences. South Africa moves more than 80% of the land-based freight via road freight (and a large amount of the general freight on rail also uses diesel) – one can understand that highly volatile fuel prices have an effect far beyond the road freight industry.
Diesel at the Heart of Freight Costs
In the coming fuel price increase, both grades of petrol will increase by 5,27% whilst diesel will increase increased by 11,23% or 11,71%, depending on the amount of sulphur – resulting in an average of 11,35% increase on the cost base of between 35% and 55% as noted above.
Diesel fuels a great majority of freight movement in the country, from line haul trucks that link ports and distribution centres to small delivery vehicles supplying local markets.
Since almost every sector depends on road freight, the changes in diesel prices have an exponential and expanded effect on the logistics industry and, unfortunately, the impact of fuel costs is inevitable.
As noted earlier, fuel is one of the biggest variable expenses and it impacts both short – and long-distance operations – it affects all legs in a logistics chain, and some transporters will now face severe cash flow constraints.
Global Pressures Shaping Local Fuel Prices
Global fuel market dynamics play an enormous role in determining fuel prices – supply and demand remains very relevant in what the (global) customer is prepared to pay for a barrel of oil, as well as the perceived shortage that drives a buying spree and thus the price for a barrel. Secondly, as oil is primarily bought with US Dollars – the value of the Rand against the Dollar plays a further (in our case) role in more expensive fuel at the pump.
Unfortunately, the majority of the petroleum products (crude oil and refined petroleum products) consumed in South Africa is imported, and this directly results in the domestic fuel cost either rising or falling.
The September increase is primarily caused by the increasing global oil prices, geopolitical concerns, and the growing instability in the global supply of energy networks.
Political turmoil in major oil producing countries has now caused increased volatility to the market, which has led to worries about possible interruptions to the major distribution and transportation routes.
Oil markets typically react quickly to geopolitical risks, pushing crude prices higher and driving up the cost of refined fuel products downstream. For an economy like South Africa that imports oil, the outcome is often inevitable: higher domestic energy prices.
The ripple effect across logistics
Again, the fuel price increase does not end at the pump price: once fuel prices increase, the cost of moving goods from production sites to distribution centres, and finally to retailers is all exposed to price increases.
Road freight plays a crucial role in the long-distance moving of goods among ports, factories, warehouses, and retail locations.
Freight companies need to remain financially viable, and thus transport companies must choose whether to increase their rates (by a variety of factors of either full fuel price increase or a percentage thereof), or whether they have the financial reserves to withstand the increases. The latter will place pressure on cashflow and reserves. Rate adjustments are often inevitable due to the recurring fuel price strain, even if some transport operators may temporarily withstand the cost to preserve contracts and relationships with clients.
How Operators are Managing Volatility
The transportation sector has grown increasingly defined by the volatility of fuel prices, and many transport companies adjust by reducing the volume of fuel used – fleet managers lever telematics technology, fuel choice, optimal routing software, driver training, new engine / vehicle technologies, congestion and standing time minimisation / avoidance and even load sharing.
Environmentally friendly driving techniques, better vehicle maintenance, and more sophisticated logistics planning are now essential resources for controlling operating expenses.
Fuel adjustment methods have been incorporated in several transport contracts, enabling operators to partially compensate for the rapid price changes without disrupting long term commitments. These approaches may reduce the effects of the rising fuel prices; however, they are not sufficient to eradicate them.
Navigating an Uncertain Road Ahead
The fuel price increase in September illustrates how vulnerable the country’s transport sector is to international energy trends.
Unfortunately, it is difficult to completely rule out further fuel price increases. Already the indicators are that tensions in the Middle East will continue to place pressure on fuel prices, and it is important to note that the northern hemisphere is now heading towards winter which will increase demand for fuel.
Thus, the ongoing geopolitical tension, the surge in risk, coupled with the supply and demand factor will continue to float high fuel prices and adaptability will continue to be vital for South Africa’s freight sector.
Transport companies’ strategies for navigating this increasingly unstable operating environment will continue to be shaped by limiting fuel use, enhancing operational efficiency, and preparing for unpredictability.
One thing is certain: In a country that is dependent on road freight, such as South Africa, every adjustment in the price of diesel has consequences extending past the petrol pump, it goes deep into the transport systems that keep the country running.
The South African Freight and Logistics Association (SAFLA) and the Road Freight Association (RFA) are jointly calling for an immediate, unified recovery plan to restore predictable cargo flow through Durban Gateway Terminal (DGT) after sustained disruption across vessel, yard, system and landside operations.
The record is stark. In July, vessels at DGT averaged some 80 hours at anchorage and 106 at berth. After the mid-August NAVIS N4 cutover, weekly throughput fell 26% and reported terminal waits reached eight to 12 days. Independent monitoring data shows average Durban port call time rising from under five days in late June to more than twelve by late August, and monthly berth calls down from 34 to 19 since May. On the roadside, the time transporters spend in the port precinct per visit has risen by more than half in three months, while Bayhead Road transit times have climbed steadily since January. The whole gateway is slowing.
The cost runs well beyond storage and demurrage: production lines waiting for inputs, emergency airfreight at a multiple of ocean cost, and trucks standing without bookings. In the 2023 logistics crisis, the GAIN Group put the cost of freight-system dysfunction at around R1 billion a day in lost output. Durban is running the same mechanisms again.
International Container Terminal Services Inc (ICTSI) assumed operational responsibility for DGT on 1 January 2026 under a 25-year partnership with Transnet, inheriting longstanding infrastructure, yard, road and rail constraints alongside pre-handover investment in 20 new straddle carriers and four ship-to-shore cranes. The question is no longer equipment purchased, but equipment available, reliable and synchronised. The NAVIS N4 transition did not create DGT’s constraints; it compounded them.
Accountability must follow the contracts: cargo owners contract with shipping lines, the lines with the terminal, and Transnet granted the concession under defined performance commitments. Transnet and the shipping lines therefore hold the standing to bring the terminal to account — and neither should pass the cost of disruption down a chain that controls none of it.
“Cargo owners and freight forwarders do not experience the port as separate institutions. They experience one chain,” says David Logan, Executive Officer of SAFLA. “If systems, straddles, slots, gates, roads or rail fail to align, cargo stops. The priority is not institutional blame. It is disciplined recovery, with clear owners, deadlines and one trusted set of numbers.”
“Transporters are carrying this crisis on their balance sheets,” continues Gavin Kelly, Chief Executive Officer of the RFA. “Fleets are standing without bookings while fixed costs run, drivers are queuing on Bayhead Road, and every standing hour ends up in the price of goods. Slot releases must match real capacity, and truck staging must be fast-tracked now. Without trucks, South Africa stops.”
The associations propose a DGT Recovery Compact built on five actions:
1. One recovery structure — the terminal, Transnet entities, eThekwini, shipping lines, transporters, labour and industry bodies in one daily structure, with government facilitating rather than managing.
2. A public, 30-day recovery plan — daily targets and one public dashboard: vessel waiting and berth times, crane productivity, equipment availability, system stability, yard utilisation, dwell, truck turnaround, rail evacuation.
3. Stabilisation of systems, equipment and the yard — NAVIS Hypercare retained until cargo-flow thresholds are sustained, backed by a straddle and crane reliability programme and accelerated evacuation of long-dwell containers.
4. A coordinated landside plan — appointment releases aligned with real capacity, published slot schedules, reasons for cancellations, disclosure of any preferential access, and fast-tracked truck staging.
5. Fair commercial treatment — transparent prioritisation of reefers, perishables and critical cargo, and published relief processes for storage, demurrage and detention where delays lay beyond the cargo owner’s control.
The associations acknowledge DGT’s Hypercare support, storage extensions and Radar platform, and the Presidency’s involvement. What is still missing is one consolidated, independently understandable set of performance indicators.
“The Transnet–ICTSI partnership was created to change Durban’s trajectory, and we want it to succeed,” Logan says. “Success will be measured by predictable berthing, productive ship hours, reliable truck access, effective rail evacuation and cargo arriving on time. Durban needs one recovery plan, one set of trusted numbers and shared accountability. Cargo must move — and it must keep moving.”
SAFLA and the RFA stand ready to contribute member evidence and practitioner expertise to a joint recovery task team alongside DGT, Transnet, government and other industry bodies.
Next time you’re driving on the N3, take a look at the trucks around you. Some will be carrying supermarket stock, vehicle components or building materials. Others, despite looking exactly the same, won’t be carrying anything at all.
Their deliveries have already been completed, and they’re making the journey back with an empty trailer.
For the average motorist, it probably goes unnoticed. For the logistics industry, it’s one of the biggest challenges on South Africa’s roads.
Every kilometre still costs money. The truck still burns fuel, the tyres continue to wear, the driver is still on the clock and the vehicle is unavailable for another job. The only thing that’s missing is the load.
The Delivery Might Be Finished, But the Trip Isn’t
Dropping off the last pallet doesn’t mean the day’s work is over.
As soon as a truck is unloaded, the focus shifts to the next journey. Ideally, there’s another load waiting nearby. If there is, the vehicle keeps moving and continues earning revenue. If not, it heads back empty, ready for its next assignment.
That might not sound like a major issue, but think about it across hundreds of trucks travelling every day. What looks like the occasional empty trailer quickly becomes thousands of kilometres where expensive equipment is moving without transporting a single product.
Empty Space Comes at a Cost
It’s easy to assume empty kilometres are mainly about fuel, but the impact runs much deeper.
Every trip still adds wear to the truck. Drivers still spend hours on the road. Maintenance schedules don’t change simply because the trailer is empty. More importantly, every truck travelling without freight is capacity that could have been used somewhere else.
In an industry where margins are often tight, getting more from the fleet you already have is usually far more valuable than simply adding another vehicle.
There’s No Simple Fix
If reducing empty kilometres were easy, the problem would have disappeared years ago.
A return load isn’t always available where a delivery ends. Customer collection times may not line up. Warehouses have different operating hours. Production schedules change. Sometimes the next load is simply too far away to make commercial sense.
That’s why transport planners spend so much time looking beyond individual deliveries. They’re constantly trying to connect one journey to the next, finding opportunities to keep trucks loaded for as much of the day as possible.
Technology has made that easier, but it hasn’t replaced experience. Knowing where freight is moving, understanding customer operations and building strong relationships across the supply chain still play a huge role in making those decisions.
Every Journey Counts
Whether a truck returns with another load often has very little to do with the transport company alone. Production schedules, warehouse operations, customer delivery windows and even where businesses are located all influence what happens once a delivery has been completed.
Most people driving past a truck will never know whether it’s carrying a full load or an empty trailer, and chances are they’ll never think twice about it. Yet for the businesses behind the scenes, that difference shapes everything from operating costs to fleet capacity and customer service. In logistics, making the delivery is only part of the job. Finding a way to make the journey back count is where the real challenge begins.