It’s midway through the day after June 30, 2026. The dust has settled, and it’s time to take a look at what the day held for South Africa in general – and the road freight and logistics sector, in particular.
June 30 will definitely rank as one of those days when everyone was focussed on citizens across various cities and towns protesting the problem of illegal (undocumented) foreigners and the effect these have on their daily lives.
It must be clearly stated upfront – that the fear of a repetition of the July 2021 fiasco was foremost in the minds of most businesses – especially the road freight logistics sector who were worried about staff, drivers, trucks, warehouses and stock. The experience of July 2021 is still keenly felt. Whilst the average citizen struggled with decisions around travel, going to work or even how the roads to local shops would be affected, logistics companies were shoring up defences, manoeuvring security and disaster response teams and making hard business decisions on whether to continue operating, or not.
During the day, protestors showed that South Africans can voice (display) their unhappiness / displeasure with circumstances without resorting to violence, property destruction, personal attacks or senseless acts of brutality. However, in several places in Gauteng and KZN, protesters (or opportunistic criminals) started looting shops and businesses owned by foreigners. This was both tragic and uncalled for.
What is somewhat of concern, is that the organisers stated that these protests would occur every Thursday until their demands had been met (by government). That is of concern as this can only lead to a heightened risk of violence should the “demands / expectations” not be met.
The Road Freight Association(RFA) commends the various structures, organisations and entities that combined to ensure that there were peaceful protests, with the rights of protest equally protected alongside the right to continue with everyday life and the activities related to that.
South African Police Services(SAPS),various security firms, community forums and organisations and the organisers of the various marches and protests all played a role in ensuring peace and stability.
The Association notes that, as opposed to the July 2021 episode, there was far more planning, coordination and cooperation between various sectors of society to ensure a far better response – and thereby, control.
We must recognise that. Applaud that. Reinforce that.
The country does not need to descend into another fractured hell-hole that would further destroy our reputation as the Rainbow Nation, as well as chase away any future investment and growth prospects.
Today (and in the days to come) – the inevitable “counting the cost” exercise will begin.
We have a good idea of the bill that the taxpayer had to “foot” for the SAPS presence. Based on what transpired over the day and night – probably good money well spent.
In the road freight and logistics sector, extra security was laid on, more surveillance teams and more shifts. Some transporters had doubled their vehicle applications before today – and may do the same for a day or two after to “catch up” on trips that may not have happened today.
Not necessarily an extra cost here – but perhaps more overtime than normal on the days before and after.
The important point is we have not seen burning trucks, destroyed warehouses, local retailers being looted and general wanton looting and destruction. That figure related to destruction, rebuilding, repair and replacement will be almost non-existent. Almost.
Those who chose to hold their vehicles in depots or along safe places en route (there were many of our neighbouring country transporters who chose that route) – their large vehicles cost around R4 500 a day (when you add all the fixed and operational costs into the mix over a period of a year). Smaller classes of vehicles are less.
Perhaps, if you add the full cost of all the extra security, extra shifts, extended warehousing and control, delayed trips (especially from ports or across borders), paid days for employees told to stay at home (just in case) – the sector may have incurred a hundred million rand, or so.
The real questions remain: will the problem of undocumented foreigners be resolved? Will the relevant laws relating to immigration, labour and employer duties be applied – continuously, transparently and across all sectors and employers? Is this really about undocumented foreigners – or is something else the real problem and this is just another of the “symptoms” and a vehicle to express discontent? Will the SAPS be able to continue doing the (magnificent) job it did on 30 June, everyday, everywhere, every time?
We are thankful for the mostly peaceful manner in which the protest was done. Hopefully those that can affect change (for the better) have heard.
God Bless Afrika. God Bless Her people.
Without Trucks, South Africa (and Afrika) Stops
By Gavin Kelly, CEO of the Road Freight Association
Not that long ago, supply chains relied heavily on forecasts. Businesses analysed previous sales, estimated future demand and planned months ahead. Inventory was ordered, transport was booked and warehouse space was allocated based on what companies expected customers to buy.
Forecasting is still an important part of supply chain planning, but business doesn’t always follow the plan.
Customer demand can change far more quickly than it once did. A product can suddenly become popular after receiving attention online, seasonal demand may arrive earlier than expected or economic conditions can change how consumers spend almost overnight. In those moments, businesses that stick rigidly to the original forecast often find themselves reacting too late.
The conversation is gradually shifting. Rather than asking, ‘Did we forecast correctly?’, more organisations are asking, ‘How quickly can we respond when demand changes?’
Forecasts Are the Starting Point, Not the Finish Line
Forecasts remain one of the most valuable planning tools in the supply chain. Manufacturers still need time to produce goods, procurement teams need to secure materials and transport providers need advance notice to plan capacity.
The difference is that forecasts are no longer treated as something that can’t be changed. They’re becoming working plans that evolve as new information comes in.
That flexibility is proving just as valuable as the forecast itself.
Listening to What the Supply Chain Is Telling You
Every customer order, inventory movement and delivery generates information. On its own, that data doesn’t say much. Over time, though, it begins to paint a picture of how demand is changing.
A product that starts selling faster than expected gives planners the opportunity to adjust purchasing before stock runs out. Equally, slower sales can signal that it’s time to rethink future orders before excess inventory starts filling valuable warehouse space.
It’s less about reacting to every fluctuation and more about recognising when a change is becoming a trend.
Responding Takes More Than Good Data
Knowing that demand has changed is only part of the challenge. The real test is whether the rest of the supply chain can respond.
If procurement can’t source materials quickly enough, warehouses don’t have available capacity or transport schedules can’t be adjusted, even the best demand information has limited value.
That’s why visibility has become so important. When procurement, warehousing, transport and inventory teams are working from the same picture, they’re able to make decisions with far greater confidence and far fewer surprises.
Adaptability Is Becoming a Competitive Advantage
No forecast will ever be perfect, and most supply chain professionals know that. The real advantage comes from recognising when reality begins to drift away from the original plan and having the flexibility to respond before customers feel the impact. Businesses will always need forecasts. They provide direction, support investment decisions and help supply chains prepare for what’s ahead. Increasingly, though, success depends just as much on what happens after the forecast is written as it does on the forecast itself.
For decades, supply chain performance was measured by one overriding objective: efficiency. Businesses invested heavily in reducing inventory, shortening lead times, consolidating warehouse networks and removing unnecessary costs from their operations. Leaner supply chains were widely seen as stronger supply chains.
Today, that assumption is being challenged.
Disruptions are no longer isolated events that happen once every few years. Port congestion, supplier shortages, transport delays, infrastructure constraints and shifting customer demand have become familiar parts of the logistics landscape. The question is no longer whether disruption will occur, but how well a business can respond when it does.
An efficient supply chain is designed for normal operating conditions. A resilient supply chain is designed for the exceptions.
When Efficiency Creates Risk
Lean operations have transformed supply chains around the world. Lower inventory levels reduce carrying costs, fewer suppliers simplify procurement and centralised distribution networks often improve operational efficiency.
Those same decisions, however, can also reduce flexibility. A manufacturer relying on a single supplier may benefit from lower purchasing costs, but a disruption at that supplier can quickly affect production. Likewise, a centralised distribution centre may reduce operating expenses, yet any disruption at that facility can impact customers across an entire region.
Efficiency remains essential, but many businesses are recognising that removing every buffer from the supply chain can introduce new risks that are far more expensive when something goes wrong.
The Return of Strategic Buffers
For years, holding additional inventory was often viewed as inefficient. Today, that conversation is becoming more balanced.
Safety stock, once seen primarily as an added cost, is increasingly being recognised as a practical way to manage uncertainty. The same applies to supplier diversification. While working with multiple suppliers can increase procurement complexity, it also reduces dependence on a single source for critical materials or components.
These decisions don’t represent a move away from efficiency. They reflect a growing recognition that resilience sometimes requires carefully planned redundancy rather than eliminating every spare capacity within the network.
Looking Beyond a Single Distribution Centre
For many businesses, operating from one large distribution centre has always made financial sense. It can simplify operations, reduce overheads and make inventory easier to manage. The challenge comes when that one facility experiences delays or has to support customers spread across a large geographic area.
That’s why some organisations are taking another look at how their networks are set up. Regional distribution centres may cost more to operate, but they can shorten delivery times, reduce transport distances and make it easier to keep goods moving when one part of the network comes under pressure.
Technology is helping businesses make those decisions with greater confidence. Instead of relying on assumptions, supply chain teams can see how inventory is moving, where transport delays are occurring and which parts of the network are carrying the most risk.
Looking Beyond the Lowest Cost
For a long time, supply chain performance was judged largely on cost. Lower transport spend, leaner inventory and better warehouse utilisation were all signs of an efficient operation.
Those measures still matter, but they’re no longer telling the whole story. Businesses are also asking different questions. How quickly can we recover if a supplier can’t deliver? How much disruption can our network absorb before customers feel the impact? Are we meeting service expectations consistently, even when conditions change?
Those questions don’t replace efficiency – they add another layer to it. The strongest supply chains aren’t always the cheapest to run. More often, they’re the ones that continue performing when the unexpected becomes part of the working day.
I find myself having the same conversations with business owners in late November – always too late to make a difference. They typically have three strong trading days as customers work through their wish lists. Then a public holiday comes and nothing moves, followed by a new week that opens with forty parcels sitting on a late collection and customers on WhatsApp politely asking where their orders are. You know that courtesy has a shelf life.
Most merchants treat that new week as something to survive, but working with them day-to-day has shown us that it is far more useful to use these long weekends as a dry run for the biggest shopping weekend of the year – Black Friday/Cyber Monday.
The upcoming Women’s Day long weekend provides an excellent opportunity to dry run the three pressures that define Black Friday: an order spike, a pause in collections, and a backlog clearing while new orders land. Get it wrong in August and you could lose a few customers; in November, you stand to lose the season.
This matters more each year as larger retailers keep shrinking the gap between order and doorstep, and shoppers expect everyone to match it. Services like Checkers Sixty60 have passed 100 million orders across close to 700 stores. The delivery speed shoppers expect from their grocery run has become the benchmark every other vendor is measured against. More people are placing more orders, and growing less patient with a poor delivery service.
Business owners have roughly ten weeks before an October system freeze locks things down. Here are four things you can do to stress test for Black Friday before it’s too late to make code changes.
1. The gap between purchase and waybill
Your first possible bottleneck sits just past checkout in the time between an order landing and you being able to create a waybill. Ideally, that gap is seconds. If it takes hours, or you are typing an address into a courier portal, you have found your first problem and higher order volumes will only worsen it.
Get ahead of this by tracking what stalls: failed connections, duplicate shipments, orders stuck on pending, anything needing a manual fix. On a well-integrated platform, that count sits near zero and the waybill follows the sale automatically, freeing your team to focus on the customer, not the admin.
2. What the customer sees after dispatch
Late parcels don’t automatically lose customers but silence can. A shopper who cannot see their order assumes the worst and messages you. Each assumption puts the success of your weekend and reputation at risk. Your focus should be on tracking exceptions, non-delivery reports (an NDR is logged when a courier cannot complete a delivery), return-to-origin rates, repeat attempts, and “where is my order” messages piling up.
Many failed deliveries are caused by a wrong or incomplete address, and each one comes with costs: a redelivery, the time cost of a support call, and sometimes the sale itself. Proactive tracking systems that keep customers up to date answer most of those questions before they are asked.
3. Courier performance on your own routes
Most merchants set their courier rules once and never look at them again, and many take advertised transit times at face value rather than as a claim to test. Testing these systems and asking critical questions of your courier partner is the key to getting ahead of any problems.
Testing lets you quantify the value you are getting from each courier and plan for contingencies. Relying on a single courier means your only backup plan is hope. The stress of managing multiple delivery providers, however, pulls your attention away from your customer. Platforms that give you the option to choose from multiple couriers enable stability even when systems are under pressure.
4. Every step that still needs a person
Question every manual process: courier allocation, waybill generation, address correction, customer notifications, status updates. When you are small, doing some of these by hand is manageable; for a business that is scaling, this quickly becomes unsustainable.
Note every point where someone had to step in to complete a routine task and treat each one as something to automate or rewrite. The right setup takes that work off your team entirely: a single integrated platform that turns a sale into a waybill, multi-courier routing that reroutes in seconds, and tracking that keeps customers informed before they need to ask.
Read the data the week after the holiday, fix your three biggest weaknesses by the end of September, and confirm the fixes hold before the freeze. Do that and the calm forty-order weekend and the frantic four-hundred-order one should feel the same to your team. Leave the diagnosis until Black Friday and you will learn the same lessons at a far higher price.