Connect with us

Logistics

Out, Out with all Foreigners – Is That Really What SA Is Calling For?

Published

on

Admin

The President addressed the country on Sunday, 07 June 2026 – reminiscent of those Family meetings during Covid – and ambled down a route as to why we are not an anti-foreigner country (the nasty word is xenophobic), what the government is (not) doing to address the situation, and what we as employers are doing wrong and therefore are to be ashamed of ourselves and will be prosecuted.

The President eloquently noted during his address:

“ … As part of rebuilding the labour enforcement capacity, the Department of Employment and Labour has launched the phased recruitment of 10,000 inspectors for this financial year. We are going to increase the penalties, including imprisonment, for employers who violate the Immigration Act … To address violations of immigration and labour laws in the transport sector, we are implementing a plan that has been developed with the logistics and freight industry and labour organisations …”

The Road Freight Association (RFA) reminds the President of the various urgent communications addressed to him in 2018 and 2022 by the Association, regarding this very matter – more specifically the issue of the employment of undocumented (illegal) foreigners in the road freight and logistics industry.

Suggestions were made, proposals on how to address the matter were provided and the offer to assist with addressing the situation was made. Nothing much came of that.

A Presidential Task Team (involving the then Ministers of Police, Labour and Transport) was convened – which included representatives of the afore-mentioned departments, the ATDF-SA (the prime voice for previously – now unemployed – persons / citizens from the road freight and logistics sector, union representation and the registered employer organisations within the sector).

The result was a 14 point plan being drafted. Years later – not much (well very little) progress has been made, resulting in the ATDF-SA leaving the Task Team (with continuous complaints that “government is not listening to them”). We have seen increasing frustration from their followers in the past few months.

The Task Team has focussed on “training drivers”. That was never the intention of the Task Team – reskilling those who had lost their employment for re-appointment, perhaps – but not the training of “new” drivers to fill the “jobs held by foreigners”.

The prime reasons why there is “widespread” use of foreign nationals in the road freight and logistics sector boils down to three simple facts:

  1. The requirement for registration by all companies / entities that move freight on a public road is not required / enforced / monitored,
  2. The inspection of all companies within the sector is not done (only the “known / compliant / registered” companies are inspected, over and over again, and
  3. There is no requirement when registering as an operator (road freight transporter) to prove registration with the National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight and Logistics Industry (NBCRFLI), an employer organisation and whom your drivers are.

Without these – as the Association has repeatedly noted to the Department of Transport – the current situation will continue and deteriorate.

There are further aspects of the National Road Transport Act (NRTA), Act 93 of 1996, as amended, that are not applied. The application of current legislation would further resolve (and have prevented in the road freight sector) the current situation experienced.

But make no mistake: the situation relating to undocumented foreigners being employed is just as prevalent, if not worse, in other sectors – most probably for the very same reasons. Current labour and / or sector specific legislation not being applied / implemented.

The President further notes that there will be thousands of “new labour inspectors” being appointed and deployed. This will, in reality,  have no real effect if the current status quo of inspections is maintained i.e. inspecting registered (known) companies that are (in the main) compliant. This means audits for the currently targeted companies may increase (unfairly so) which can hinder operational efficiencies in some regard (if personnel are constantly chasing after inspection requirements and not company operational requirements).

It is also quite clear that the threat of prosecution, which currently is catered for in legislation, has not been seen to be a deterrent (mainly due to poor inspection processes, poor prosecution, weak cases and the power of those who are not compliant to subvert the processes).

The most “immediate effect” of trying to counter foreign nationals entering the country (in an illegal / undocumented state) will be felt at the ports of entry (land, air and sea). This could, if strictly applied, create backlogs / congestion / queues in the processing pf persons (travellers) through passport control.

Foreign drivers of foreign vehicles are generally not problematic (they are employed outside of the country). There would need to be checks as to whether freight vehicles are carrying passengers (and their status).

The real test lies within the country itself.  That’s what the Road Freight Association has said, Mr President, over and over again. There is sufficient enabling legislation. There are clear rules and circumstances detailing when and why foreigners may be offered employment in preference to South African citizens. Apply that. Consistently. Rigorously. Require ALL employers jump through the hoops required (whether general or sector specific).

This is not about removing all foreigners – just because they are foreign. It’s about following the rules. Applying the rules. Making the process just, fair and consistent.

By Gavin Kelly, CEO of the Road Freight Association

Continue Reading

Logistics

Building Supply Chain Resilience When Weather Disrupts the Network.

Published

on

Aerial shot of a blue delivery van driving in a heavy storm.

Heavy rain, dense fog, flooding and icy conditions can affect roads, routes and delivery schedules with little warning. For businesses, the consequences can move quickly beyond a delayed parcel. Inventory can be stranded, customer commitments can be missed, production schedules can be disrupted and revenue can be put under pressure.

In South Africa, disruption is often localised. Rain in the Western Cape, fog in parts of Gauteng and Mpumalanga, or hazardous conditions on inland routes may affect one part of a network while operations elsewhere continue. In a connected network, however, a local disruption can create a wider ripple effect when shipments, inventory and delivery commitments depend on connected routes.

For FedEx, resilience is therefore not about trying to eliminate disruption. It is about having enough visibility to see risk early, enough flexibility to adjust the plan and the operational capability to respond before a local problem becomes a wider business issue.

“Weather can add another layer of complexity to logistics operations, especially when poor visibility, road closures or changing conditions affect planned routes,” says Nelson Teixeira, Managing Director of Operations for Sub-Saharan Africa at FedEx. “Businesses that understand where their risks are and have contingency plans in place are in a stronger position to adjust when needed and communicate proactively with customers.”

FedEx transport van travelling through the country side.

Prepare for Disruption

The strongest response to a weather event often begins before the weather arrives. Businesses should know which shipments, routes and inventory positions are most critical to continuity. That can mean identifying alternative routes, allowing appropriate contingency in time-sensitive deliveries, reviewing where critical inventory is held, and establishing clear priorities for shipments that cannot afford extended delays.

This is where the relationship with a logistics provider matters. A resilient network is not simply a collection of transport options; it is the ability to use those options when circumstances change.

For businesses moving urgent or export-bound goods, flexibility can also mean having access to services designed around time-sensitive international movement. FedEx International Priority® is a time-definite, customs-cleared international service available to more than 220 countries and territories, with shipment tracking included. The value during disruption is not simply speed; it is having a defined service option when timing is central to a customer or commercial commitment. Availability and transit times vary by origin, destination and shipment.

See Risk Earlier

Preparation creates flexibility. Visibility helps businesses know when to act.

“Good visibility gives businesses more options,” says Teixeira. “If you know where a shipment is and can see where delays may be developing, you have a better chance of responding early. That might mean adjusting a plan, preparing for a revised delivery time or simply giving a customer an update before they have to ask.”

FedEx offers a range of visibility, monitoring and intervention capabilities designed to support critical shipments. For selected shipments, FedEx Priority Alert® provides enhanced shipment status tracking and operational recovery procedures. For temperature-sensitive shipments, Priority Alert Plus™ adds proactive intervention capabilities, including re-icing, gel-pack replenishment and cold storage. These services are designed to give critical shipments additional oversight when conditions become more challenging.

Respond with Agility

Once disruption is developing, the advantage comes from being able to act before every option has narrowed. A route may need to change or a customer may need a revised expectation. Inventory or receiving teams may need to prepare for a different arrival time. The earlier businesses can identify the risk and assess their options, the more opportunity they have to mitigate its impact.


This is particularly relevant in South Africa, where disruption in one corridor can have consequences across a connected network. The ability to recognise and absorb that disruption quickly therefore becomes critical.

For businesses, communication is part of that response. Customers may accept that weather is outside a company’s control, but uncertainty is harder to manage. Realistic, revised timelines and proactive updates give customers something they can plan around.

“Reliability does not mean that everything will always go exactly according to plan,” says Teixeira. “Sometimes unexpected challenges arise and delays happen. The key is having the right information, coordinating closely and responding in a way that keeps both the business and the customer informed.”

That is the practical meaning of resilience in a logistics network. It is not the promise that disruption will never happen, but the ability to see risk, adapt and reduce the uncertainty surrounding it.

Weather will continue to disrupt routes, close roads and put pressure on delivery networks. Businesses cannot control those conditions, but they can prepare for where disruption matters most and respond while there is still time to act.


That can help protect inventory, business continuity and customer commitments, while maintaining the confidence that customers place in a business when it matters most.

Continue Reading

Freight Forwarding

What More Private Investment Could Mean for South Africa’s Freight Network

Published

on

South African yellow and grey trains parked in a service yard.

South Africa’s freight challenges are not confined to one port, railway line or logistics facility. They stem from a network that must move goods between farms, factories, warehouses, ports and international markets, often through infrastructure that has struggled to keep pace with demand.

That is why private investment in logistics infrastructure deserves attention beyond the value of any individual transaction.

Absa’s reported expansion of its financing support for logistics infrastructure developer Newlyn Group to R5.1 billion raises a broader question: can private capital help close the gaps between the different parts of South Africa’s freight network?

The answer will depend less on the amount invested than on where the money goes, how projects connect to existing infrastructure, and whether the resulting facilities improve the movement of cargo.

The Problem is Not Simply a Lack of Warehouses

South Africa has logistics facilities across its major industrial and commercial centres. However, warehouse capacity alone does not resolve the challenges facing the freight system.

A warehouse may provide valuable storage space, but its usefulness depends on what happens outside its gates. If trucks face congestion, rail services are unreliable, or port operations are delayed, the warehouse becomes another holding point in an already disrupted chain.

The more important investment is in infrastructure that connects different activities.

This includes logistics parks near industrial centres, facilities linked to rail terminals, storage close to ports, and sites that allow cargo to move between road and rail without unnecessary handling or additional journeys.

The value lies in the connection. A facility that is properly integrated into the wider network can help businesses plan movements more efficiently and reduce the number of disconnected steps between origin and destination.

Why Multimodal Infrastructure Matters

Road freight remains essential because it offers flexibility and can reach locations that are not served directly by rail. It is particularly important for first-mile and last-mile movements.

Rail, however, can play a different role by moving larger volumes over longer distances. When the two modes are connected effectively, businesses can use each where it makes the most operational and economic sense.

This is the thinking behind multimodal logistics infrastructure.

Cargo could move by truck to a rail-linked facility, travel longer distances by rail, and then return to road freight for final delivery. Warehousing and storage positioned around these connections can support consolidation, distribution and export activity.

This model does not eliminate the need for trucks. It can, however, reduce the pressure on road freight by giving operators more options for moving cargo through the network.

For South Africa, that matters because freight costs are influenced not only by fuel and vehicle expenses, but also by delays, empty running, congestion, repeated handling and unreliable schedules.

Durban Shows Why the Connections Matter

The Durban–Gauteng corridor illustrates the challenge.

Cargo moving through the Port of Durban must travel between the coast and the country’s major industrial and distribution centres. That movement depends on a combination of port operations, rail infrastructure, road freight, warehouses, terminals and inland distribution facilities.

If one part of the corridor performs poorly, pressure is often transferred elsewhere. Delays at a port can affect truck scheduling. Rail constraints can push more cargo onto roads. Congestion can increase turnaround times and raise operating costs for transporters.

Investment in facilities near the port or along important freight routes could improve the way cargo is staged, stored and transferred. These facilities, however, will only deliver their full value if they are supported by reliable road access, functioning rail connections and efficient port operations.

This is the important distinction between building logistics infrastructure and improving logistics performance.

Private Capital Cannot Fix the Entire Network

Private investment can provide funding for new facilities, equipment, technology and development capacity. It can also introduce commercial pressure to improve service delivery and make better use of assets.

However, private logistics developments remain dependent on the wider transport system.

A privately financed rail terminal cannot operate effectively if the rail network lacks capacity. A modern warehouse cannot compensate for severe port delays. A logistics park may still struggle if road access is congested or surrounding infrastructure is inadequate.

Private investment should therefore not be viewed as a replacement for public infrastructure reform. It is one part of a wider system that includes Transnet, municipalities, road authorities, port operators, rail infrastructure managers, freight customers and logistics companies.

The strongest projects will be those planned with these dependencies in mind.

The Timing is Significant

South Africa is pursuing changes to its freight logistics system, including private-sector participation in port operations and the opening of the rail network to third-party operators.

These reforms could create opportunities for infrastructure developers and financial institutions. As more operators enter the market, supporting facilities such as terminals, storage, maintenance sites and cargo-handling infrastructure will become increasingly important.

But the relationship works both ways. New infrastructure can support reform by making it easier for different operators to access the network. At the same time, the success of those facilities will depend on whether the reforms improve the underlying network.

Coordination will therefore matter as much as the availability of finance.

The Real Measure Will Be Better Cargo Movement

The significance of a large logistics financing facility should ultimately be measured by what it changes on the ground.

Does it reduce unnecessary truck movements? Does it make rail a more practical option for freight customers? Does it improve access to ports, reduce handling delays or help exporters move goods more predictably?

These are the outcomes that matter to manufacturers, retailers, exporters, transport operators and consumers.

Private capital has an important role to play in South Africa’s freight recovery. But investment figures alone do not improve a supply chain. The real opportunity lies in using that capital to build the connections the country’s logistics network has been missing.

For South Africa, the bigger test is whether investments like this can help move the country from isolated logistics projects towards a more connected, reliable and competitive freight system.

Continue Reading

Logistics

Preparing South Africa’s Logistics Industry for 2030, Focused on Compliance, People, and Sustainability.

Published

on

Man using a tablet with a futuristic view of the logistics world as a freight ship, plane and trucks travel in the background.

By Harry Dimo, HR Director, BIL & Lawrence Aldworth, National Compliance and Risk Manager, BIL

Ask most logistics leaders what sustainability means, and the conversation quickly turns to emissions, electric vehicles and carbon reporting. While those issues matter, they’ve also created one of the industry’s biggest blind spots. Sustainability has become an environmental conversation when it should be a business one.

The logistics businesses that will thrive beyond 2030 will not simply be those with the lowest carbon footprint. They will be the organisations that embed sustainability into every aspect of their operations, from developing their people and embracing innovation to strengthening governance, ensuring compliance and building resilience.

For Harry Dimo, HR Director at Bidvest International Logistics, that journey starts with people: “We’re assessing the competencies required now and in the future so we can begin upskilling employees for where the business is going, not just where it is today.”

As automation, digitalisation and artificial intelligence continue to reshape supply chains, organisations must prepare employees to work alongside these technologies rather than be displaced by them. Future-ready businesses are identifying tomorrow’s skills today, investing in continuous learning and equipping people to adapt as customer expectations and business needs evolve. Investing in future capability is every bit as important as investing in greener technology.

“When people hear sustainability, they immediately think environmental. But sustainability is much broader than that. It’s about environmental, social and governance principles working together to create a business that is built to last,” says Lawrence Aldworth, National Compliance and Risk Manager at Bidvest International Logistics.

That broader definition is becoming increasingly important as customers raise their expectations. Organisations are no longer evaluated solely on price, service and operational capability. Increasingly, customers are assessing the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) maturity of companies, making responsible business practices a key competitive differentiator. Businesses that fail to evolve risk being excluded from future opportunities rather than simply falling behind competitors.

Sustainability is therefore not another initiative sitting alongside the business. It is the framework through which the business operates. Environmental responsibility protects natural resources. Good governance builds trust, accountability and resilience, while investment in people ensures organisations can respond to changing technologies, customer expectations and market demands.

Innovation and compliance are equally important. By empowering employees to contribute ideas and embrace technology, organisations create a culture of continuous improvement that strengthens operational performance, enhances customer outcomes and increases employee engagement.

As Harry explains: “Leadership can define the vision for the future, but it is our people who bring that vision to life every day. Preparing them for what comes next is one of the most important investments we can make.”

Compliance should also be viewed through a different lens. Too often perceived as a cost of doing business, effective governance creates measurable value by reducing operational risk, protecting customers’ products and strengthening confidence among organisations that increasingly expect responsible business practices from their logistics partners.

Lawrence adds: “Good compliance management reduces risk, which ultimately reduces cost. It also creates value for customers by protecting their products while they’re in our care.”

The organisations best positioned for the future are those that combine resilience with adaptability. They invest in capable people, encourage innovation, strengthen governance and continuously evolve to meet changing customer needs.

Sustainability is not just about protecting the planet’s future. It is about building organisations that are equipped to protect their people’s future, earn their customers’ trust, and adapt with confidence to whatever comes next. Businesses that embrace this broader definition of sustainability will not only remain relevant but also help shape the future of logistics.

Continue Reading

Trending